Welcome to Purple Pawn, covering games played around the world by billions of people every day.
19 Feb
Posted by Yehuda Berlinger as Card Games
South Carolina’s laws vaguely state any game involving dice or cards could be considered a gambling game, even if you’re not playing for money. Over the last two years, several arrests and fines made it to the news.
So it’s a nice turn to see that one of these cases finally went before a judge, who ruled that there is overwhelming evidence that Texas Hold’em is a skill game, not a gambling game. This follows a similar ruling from Pennsylvania last month.
It didn’t stop the judge from finding the particular defendants guilty, however, for reasons I don’t entirely understand (elucidation would be appreciated).
(source)
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
I think it works like this: yes, Texas Hold’em is a game of skill, but the players were still gambling on the outcome of a game of skill, hence they are guilty of breaking state law.
In other words, South Carolina can’t set up casinos where Texas Hold’em is played as it is usually played as this would be gambling, but they *can* run Texas Hold’em *tournaments* where players pay a fixed fee to compete in a game of skill to win prizes.
This is a fascinating test case – thanks so much for flagging it up!
Thanks, Chris. That makes sense.